Mapping New England: Changes in Median Rents
Nationally, half of all renters are now spending more than 30 percent of their income on housing. That is up from 38 percent of renters in 2000. Moreover, the percentage of renters is increasing in the region. In New England, the percentage of households living in a rental unit increased from 28.6 percent in 2010 to 31.2 percent in 2015. One way to examine postrecession changes within the rental market is to look at changes in monthly median gross rents[1] for one-bedroom apartments. Large percentage changes occurred in metro areas across New England, including the New Haven, Boston, Providence, and Burlington metro areas.[2] The map illustrates the changes in median rents by metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs).
An obvious concern with increasing rents is how much of an individual's income is allocated towards rent. Budget experts recommend that individuals spend no more than 30 percent of their income on housing. Individuals who allocate more than 30 percent of their income to housing are considered to be housing-cost burdened.
At least 45 percent of renters within New England are classified as being housing-cost burdened, and the largest percentage of housing-cost burdened renters reside within the New Haven, CT, metro area. Median one-bedroom rents within the New Haven, CT, metro rose 19.33 percent, and 57 percent of all renters are housing-cost burdened.
Percent change in rent for selected metro areas[3]
2010 One-Bedroom Median Monthly Rent | 2017 One-Bedroom Median Monthly Rent | Percentage Chance in Median Rent | Percentage of Renters Who Are Housing-Cost Burdened[4] | |
Grafton County, NH | $767 | $970 | 26.47% | 45.41% |
Burlington-South Burlington, VT, MSA | $929 | $1,169 | 25.83% | 53.39% |
Kennebec County, ME | $570 | $708 | 24.21% | 51.32% |
New Haven-Meriden, CT, HUD Metro FMR Area | $978 | $1,167 | 19.33% | 57.03% |
Boston-Cambridge- Quincy, MA-NH HUD Metro FMR Area | $1,275 | $1,494 | 17.18% | 49.23% |
Providence-Fall River, RI- MA HUD Metro FMR Area | $860 | $888 | 3.26% | 51.25% |
Articles may be reprinted if Communities & Banking and the author are credited and the following disclaimer is used: "The views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston or the Federal Reserve System. Information about organizations and upcoming events is strictly informational and not an endorsement."
About the Authors
Amy Higgins,
Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
Email: Amy.Higgins@bos.frb.org
Endnotes
- Median rents are calculated by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). These are not fair market rents (FMR).
- The metro areas used in this analysis are defined by HUD and generally align with the federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB) metropolitan area definitions. However, in order to have a more precisely defined local housing market area, HUD occasionally constructs a narrower local housing market which represents only part of the OMB's metropolitan area.
- Median rents are expressed in nominal dollars. The metro areas selected in the table are the metro areas that experienced the largest percentage change in median rent for each state within New England.
- Percentage of renters who are housing-cost burdened was calculated using the 2015 American Community Survey five-year estimates.
Resources
Site Topics
Related Content
Mapping New England: Changes in Home Purchase Mortgage Originations, by County
Research Forum: Assessing the Impact of New England's Changing Demographics
Proposal to Offset Families’ Child-Care Costs Could Enhance Equity by Dramatically Cutting Poverty Among People of Color Across New England
The Effects of Weather on Massachusetts Municipal Expenditures: Implications of Climate Change for Local Governments in New England