Purchasing Power Parity within the United States
Economics has many articles of faith. One of the most dearly held is Purchasing Power Parity, which posits that the price of the same good in different regions should be equivalent when no barriers to arbitrage exist. Because Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) is an important assumption in much of international economic theory, this article examines empirical evidence testing this proposition.
Instead of analyzing international data, this study analyzes PPP between regions of the United States. By comparing regions within a country, it eliminates many of the hypotheses offered to explain the failure of PPP. The results of this study are suggestive. PPP fails to hold within regions of the United States. Instead, the inclusion of nontraded goods in the total consumer price indices for these regions is shown to be the major cause of this failure. When the nontraded components of these indices are removed, PPP holds. Some categories of goods do seem to move in lockstep while others do not, as one would expect, and as PPP predicts.
About the Authors
Resources
Related Content
Uncertain Futures? Youth Attachment to the Labor Market in the United States and New England
Changing Patterns in Informal Work Participation in the United States 2013–2015
Labor Force Participation in New England vs. the United States, 2007–2015: Why Was the Regional Decline More Moderate?
Price Setting in Online Markets: Does IT Click?